Friday, August 5, 2011

Egg - The Civil Surface


The sound of a ticking metronome opens Egg's third and final album, 1974's The Civil Surface.  I don't think there's any better sound to introduce a band like Egg, whose music is probably the most classically-influenced of all the Canterbury bands and is typified by Mont Campbell's precise, intricate compositions that are filled in by Dave Stewart's interweaving organ and keyboard parts and driven by Clive Brooks' undeniably exact skills at the drum kit.  The Civil Surface is really more of a reunion album for Egg (not to be confused with newer group, The Egg), as the group had broken up in 1972--luckily for us, they had another album in them and here develop the sound of their first two albums even further.

Being a reunion album, The Civil Surface is a bit of a fractured collection.  Therein lies the main stumbling block regarding my ability to enjoy Egg--they present some of the most interesting and "out" ideas of any of the Canterbury (or any other progressive bands, for that matter), but when it comes to crafting a cohesive and really great album, they were never really able to make it happen.  The ideas really do reach rarefied heights, though.  The aforementioned opener, "Germ Patrol" is perhaps most typical of the group's overall career sound, with plenty of Canterbury fuzz organ and bass, jazz harmony and ear-surprising twists.  It's on this track I most notice a common complaint with The Civil Surface--the drums are mixed extremely loudly, and it's especially painful when Brooks goes for the high-hat, with lots of sibilance that can be really sharp and hard on the ears.  Because of this, the album doesn't really sound good on a lot of sound systems (especially ones prone to treble-y sound), and the more you push the volume to discern the compositional intricacies, the more the drums get in the way.  The song plays effectively with additive rhythms and builds on its somewhat anonymous melody, though, and features nice clarinet and bassoon from Henry Cow guests Tim Hodgkinson and Lindsay Cooper, respectively, and some signature french horn from Campbell.  This style reprises on the confusingly-titled mid-album "Prelude," which also features wordless female vocals reminiscent of those which would later appear on related acts Hatfield and the North and National Health.

The album's crowning achievement is undoubtedly "Enneagram," which Mont Campbell supposedly composed in response to composer Aaron Copland's criticism that his "Long Piece" (from The Polite Force) was merely music of repetitions and didn't develop.  Campbell certainly took Copland's words to heart--over its 9 minutes, "Enneagram" develops Egg's tricky rhythms to their fullest, alternating between driving hard, fuzzed-out riffs and spacey sections where Stewart's keys flitter away with echo and the cymbals provide a backdrop for Campbell's bass runs.  The song's rousing conclusion fuses heavy toms with stuttering organ and bass unison.  It's really interesting to hear Dave Stewart's keyboard work in the midst of the 70's; though the compositions are mostly Campbell's, there are keyboard moments that recall both the gentle jazzy interludes of previous band Khan as well as crisp contrapuntal figures that predict breaks that show up later in National Health and Hatfield and the North.  Though that style dominates here, I think it displays Stewart's abilities to play to different styles but also forge a distinctive style of his own when the time came for his compositions to dominate.

As for the rest of the set, there's material that echoes Egg's earlier work ("Wring Out the Ground Loosely Now"), featuring what are probably Campbell's weakest vocals to date and some mainly textural guitar from Gong and future solo star Steve Hillage.  Compared musically and lyrically with "Contrasong" from The Polite Force, it doesn't hold up so well--depending on how you look at it, the vocals either add variety to or awkwardly interrupt a mostly-instrumental album.  There's also plenty of material exhibiting some modern classical vibes, like the interesting and blithely-plodding "Nearch" which joyfully experiments with continually-increasing amounts of silence, and two wind quartets, which only feature Campbell from the Egg lineup.  To my ears, the sprightly first quartet ironically echoes some of Copland's more accessible works, albeit with a little more dissonance, and the second experiments more with longer-sustained notes and a sort of rocking eighth-note rhythmic figure.  The quartets are good, in my opinion, but if you came to Egg looking for their more rocking tendencies, I can see how you might find them irrelevant and cluttering.  As I mentioned earlier, despite a wealth of creative ideas, the album can't seem to weave its variety into a really good flow.  Still, I manage to enjoy it quite a bit every time I hear it!

Thinking about Egg in the context of their whole discography and the Canterbury scene in general, it seems like their strengths lie more in their rhythmic and contrapuntal pursuits rather than their melodies--even the best songs here are difficult to recall melodically, in part due to the fact that only bass and keyboards contribute to the melodic statements.  Though melody probably wasn't on top of the list of the band's intentions, I can't help feeling that this contributes in a mildly negative way to their overall accessibility--but hey, we're talking about the Canterbury scene already, so there's no need to worry about billboard charts!  Judging by his recent interviews on the BBC's progressive rock documentary and on blog friend It's Psychedelic Baby's recent interview, Mont Campbell is fairly bitter that he wasn't allowed to fully flower as a composer and musician because the music business wasn't nurturing enough.  It's the sad truth, but three albums released on fairly large labels is a whole lot better than similar artists are getting these days!  Sometimes we just have to nurture ourselves.

2 comments:

Edmund said...

While I appreciate your indepth insight to this Egg album, I'm curious as per how come you find Dirk Campbell's attitude "bitter"? Sure, he admitted he needed praise and he felt somewhat miffed over not getting much of it at all. But I don't really think Campbell is any more bitter about his failure as a prog-rocker, any more than Robert Wyatt is bitter over getting sacked from Soft Machine. Surely, a statement from Wyatt: "I feel about SM a bit like Palestinians feel about Israel - this band was mine!" has got to rank more, uhh, emotional than somewhat dryly formal and analytic: "I quit rather suddenly simply because of my dependent psychology".

I do think the problem with BBC Prog doc as well as with PsychBaby interview is that they only focus on the rock aspects of Campbell's career. Now here's another interview that focuses on everything else. Dirk there comes across as stoic and a person who has stressed a lot in the past, but has come to the mind-set of acceptance and has found his musical niche to boot. http://soniccontrol.tv/2008/08/10/dirk-campbells-origins/

I personally don't know Dirk, but I like Egg and early National Health quite a bit and from what I've heard, Dirk Campbell really seems to put 110 percent into his efforts of expanding his musical awareness as well as integrating the new exotic influences into his musical vocabulary. Thus, all of this means that Dirk C. is a bit of a hero to me, so maybe I'm too biased to consider him "fairly bitter"?

Elliot Knapp said...

Hi ElectricThoreau,

Thanks for stopping by, and thanks for sharing that other Campbell interview--very interesting and, like you say, it illuminates the depth of his career and more recent activities better than the other two interviews.

In my opinion, there's nothing wrong with a musician expressing bitterness at an event or circumstance that occurred earlier in their career, and to me, that's exactly what Campbell was doing in both of those interviews. In any case, these feelings seem to have played a part in his not making much more rock-oriented music, which is where most of us tend to group Egg and the rest of the Canterbury projects he was involved in.

For me, expression of resentment or bitterness is not something that disqualifies someone from being a musical hero--these sorts of things only serve to shade and humanize my favorite musical personages with more complexity and keep me from unrealistically idealizing them. Thinking analytically and critically about my favorite music and musicians is a pretty important part of my own creative learning process, and in this case Campbell's feelings toward his past strike a specific chord with my current situation. Yes, we all need a certain amount of nurturing and praise, but there comes a point where you have to decide if what you're doing is worthwhile enough to continue doing without external praise or compensation, and I worry that giving up too soon can mean missing out on some of the biggest artistic payoff.

In other words, I like Campbell too, but I think there's something to be learned both from his music and from his experiences in the music business. Thanks for a thought-provoking comment...hope to see more in the future!